Dog Advice & Discussion :: Dog Chat
March 06, 2007, 11:45: PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Like our new layout? Having trouble using the board? Get in touch with us at admin@dogchat.co.uk
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 19
  Print  
Author Topic: APDT Training Statement - Say No to Treats.  (Read 2014 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
jenci
Fully Trained Dog Chat User


Respect Points: -3
Offline Offline

Posts: 53


View Profile
« Reply #45 on: December 31, 2006, 02:06: PM »

Quote
You've studied operant conditioning and presumably learning theory, Jenci. It's not difficult to work out why the pain/discomfort had this effect/fall-out

No it is not difficult at all. Indeed it is very easy - so easy in fact that I would never consider taking my dog to a behaviorist - imagine asking someone with a three year degree in theory how to solve a practical problem - sounds like a crap shoot to me.

Experience is worth far more than theory - if behaviorists are basing decisions on theory that is simply another reason not to take your dog to them.

Logged
Yorkie
Guest
« Reply #46 on: December 31, 2006, 02:10: PM »

Perhaps you could point us to where you got these actual figures from. Sounds like a pluck fro fresh air to me.
Stan

Ask a silly question Smile

Of course it's a pluck from thin air and Denis has already covered his back on knowing that this can't be confirmed in one of his earlier posts:

Denis: apart from that you have no way of knowing anything about the e-collar market, they would have nothing to do with you or people like in the same way you would have nothing to do with them

Yorkie: Smile Smile Smile
Logged
Denis_Carthy
Dogaholic


Respect Points: -23
Offline Offline

Posts: 690


View Profile
« Reply #47 on: December 31, 2006, 02:13: PM »

Doglistener- Perhaps you could point us to where you got these actual figures from. Sounds like a pluck fro fresh air to me.

I am a well known UK specialist, there is very little info I am unable to access if I want, you are not privileged to such access, lets face it someone who refres to e-collars of today as if they were the e-collars of 15-20-30 years ago is a statement about yourself that you’re a complete chancer.

What you need to account is why are we seeing all these people paying to be shown how to train their dogs and all we se is 100% failure, you have totally avoided that by a sidetrack post.
Logged

Yorkie
Guest
« Reply #48 on: December 31, 2006, 02:14: PM »

No it is not difficult at all. Indeed it is very easy - so easy in fact that I would never consider taking my dog to a behaviorist - imagine asking someone with a three year degree in theory how to solve a practical problem - sounds like a crap shoot to me.

Experience is worth far more than theory - if behaviorists are basing decisions on theory that is simply another reason not to take your dog to them.


You sound just like Denis, Jenci - it must be catching Smile

Actually if you are referring to my degree, then I suggest you look deeper as a big part of it was demonstrating practical skills. If you're referring to me personally, I had many years experience prior to gaining the bit of paper Smile.

Experience is alway essential Jenci, but experience with no knowledge is worse than no experience at all. Education is designed to enhance not replace experience. I would  have thought that you would have reached this conclusion yourself during the course of your studies
Logged
Yorkie
Guest
« Reply #49 on: December 31, 2006, 02:16: PM »

I am a well known UK specialist, there is very little info I am unable to access if I want, you are not privileged to such access, lets face it someone who refres to e-collars of today as if they were the e-collars of 15-20-30 years ago is a statement about yourself that you’re a complete chancer.

I did try to tell you Smile Smile

Talk about predictable!!!
Logged
Denis_Carthy
Dogaholic


Respect Points: -23
Offline Offline

Posts: 690


View Profile
« Reply #50 on: December 31, 2006, 02:18: PM »

Quote
Taliband Mulla Doglistener- Lets call them by their real name Electronic Shock Collars

As I have just pointed out APDT and of course Doglistener have the mentality of the Taliband, and who comes along to prove it, of course Doglistener.

Below are the collars which Doglistener refers to, they were very rare and used only for a life or death situation when all else failed, have been banned for around 15 to 20 years. These are the collars Mulla Doglistener used, 3 times, 15 years ago, this is the linmits of knowedge, obsolete collars which have been illegal for many years, Doglistener does not even know the name of the collars, below:

History & Evolution of The Modern E-Collar.

Chapter 1.

In The Begining.

The Specific Use, Electric Shock Collar.

Germany-UK 1950’s - late 1980’s.

There has been e-collars of one sort or another in the UK in civilian hands since around the 1950’s, these were usually brought over from Germany by service personnel and either sold on or loaned by them. A firm called Karenswood, I think from Solihull, used to get them to order or hire. Specific use Electric Shock Collars were very rare, the ones in civilian use were originated by a German Vet as a safety device to be used with his own hunting dogs instead of falt buckle and other collars, know to be highly damageing to the neck vertrate and other skeletal structures.

The only collars I knew of in the UK between 1976 and around the late 80’s were electric shock collars, long since obsolete. I was told in 1976, when I first used one, that electric shock collars first came into use in WW2 and were of German origin, I have no reason to doubt this and some German contacts confirm some sort of electric shock collar was known to be in military use in Germany at that time.

The difference between an electric shock collar and modern remote trainers was the fact that the e-shock collar had two contact points which contacted either side of the neck, 2 or 3 inches below the ears. Once fired the shock went into the neck and met the electric shock from the other contact point on the other side of the neck. The e-shock collar I used in 1976 and once in the late eighties with someone else’s dog was German in origin, it was not remote and was an electric shock collar.

 They had one very high level and could not be adjusted to the individual dog. They were only used in extreme circumstances or the “out” in protection work. They were never designed or intended for ordinary pet use and were not a training collar. They were designed solely for high drive working line dogs and were sometimes used in conjunction with a method and other aids with some pet dogs which had aggression or sheep chasing problems and were in a life, death or rescue situation.

Electric shock collars were rare in the UK, everyone I know who were training in either protection sports or training the protection dogs of that point in time as well as many show dog people had heard of ‘electric shock collars’ but few people had ever seen them and fewer still had ever used them. If I had not rescued a dog from Battersea dogs home I would probably never have seen them, even so a lot of myths about them and their use abounded in those days.

There was a more recent electric shock collar which was also made in Germany, possibly by the same manufacturer. It had the same electrodes at the side of the neck and the electric shock also went into the neck from either side, the electric shocks from each contact point met in body as before. They had low, medium and high levels and were remote.

These were in use in Europe until the late nineties but no one I have ever spoken to heard of any of them being used here in UK, I saw one in Germany and they seemed to be used pretty much like the old shock collars, as a positive punisher only. It has been illegal to sell these collars for many years, they did not pass the European CE safety standard and were dangerous to humans. The use of these collars fits the description of use given out by KC, APDT, APDT and a few other commercial competitors.

The term electric shock is a recognised scientific term, static electro muscle stimulation collars are incapable of delivering an electric shock, anyone using electric shock as their terminology when referring to electro pulse collars would be misleading others. GP's and the NHS recognises the Blacks medical dictionary as one authority.

Ch 1 updated 2006.-Remote Electronic Training Collars. Fifty years of UK history, from electric shock to a sensation Second Edition, E-Collars, Historical Clarification, from electric shock to a sensation, 1950s – 2006.
« Last Edit: December 31, 2006, 02:22: PM by Denis_Carthy » Logged

jenci
Fully Trained Dog Chat User


Respect Points: -3
Offline Offline

Posts: 53


View Profile
« Reply #51 on: December 31, 2006, 02:29: PM »

I was not referring to you at all Yorkie, I have no idea as to what qualification you have or not.

Quote
but experience with no knowledge is worse than no experience at all.

Unless a person is brain dead it is not possible to have experience without acquiring knowledge. I have many reason for not liking OC, not the least of those reasons are that it was written by scientists, not animal trainers.
Logged
Yorkie
Guest
« Reply #52 on: December 31, 2006, 02:33: PM »

[The term electric shock is a recognised scientific term, static electro muscle stimulation collars are incapable of delivering an electric shock, anyone using electric shock as their terminology when referring to electro pulse collars would be misleading others. GP's and the NHS recognises the Blacks medical dictionary as one authority.

Must be that old language barrier thing again Denis because Lou seems to disagree:

"Before I begin, let me say that if you decide to use one I recommend that you not refer to it as a "shock collar." The very name sends some people into paroxysms of fear. "How can you be soooooo cruel to shock your dog!!!"

Call it instead a remote training collar or even an electronic collar. Yes, I know its a euphemism but it may also help you think about it another way"

Lou Castle, 2002, http://www.uwsp.edu/psych/dog/LA/castle3.htm
Logged
Denis_Carthy
Dogaholic


Respect Points: -23
Offline Offline

Posts: 690


View Profile
« Reply #53 on: December 31, 2006, 02:37: PM »

Quote
Yorki- Of course it's a pluck from thin air and Denis has already covered his back on knowing that this can't be confirmed in one of his earlier posts:

Then you have to prove that what I am doing, anyone can make such a statement about everything anyone says, which makes a mockery of every post on all boards, my own record on these things is solid, you are simply making things and in doing so trying to avoid the quite obviousfacts I have posted, here they are again, WHY are these people paying money to positive trainers and getting NO results?

This post is about the dangers of treat/positive training - explain why there is such a high failure rate - in fact no success at all! why? the trainers get paid, there are no refunds, whats going on????

Treat/Positive training failures - 100% failure!


1. Lucky Star11-05-2005, 11:29 AM
Any ideas of any other way we can train recall because this reward based way doesn't seem to be working at all?

2. Lel-11-05-2005, 02:50 PM
We still cant let Libs off when others are around or in an unenclosed area as she takes no notice when someone and their dogs appear.

3. Murphy - 11-05-2005, 02:59 PM
My Murph has a terrible recall when there's distractions

4. Marean - 13-05-2005, 08:23 PM
I have a similar problem with Harvey, he is excellent with recalls until he finds something like a plastic bottle, big sticks or another dogs toy

5. iwlass 13-05-2005, 08:31 PM
 I have been using a long line to train Molo for 2 months or more as his recall went out of the window when he became a teen-pup

6. Helena 54 - 15-05-2005, 05:42 PM
if you absolutely know that they are totally distracted and you have no chance of getting them back (like I did this morning with some rabbits!)

7. JR-Tilly- 05-12-2006, 12:47 PM
Tilly out on a long line as i live in a rural area with lots of rabbits and she has a very strong hunting instinct

http://www.dogsey.com/showthread.php?t=10587

8.
Really frustrated
http://www.petfriendlyworld.com/chat/index.php?topic=6485.0
Logged

Yorkie
Guest
« Reply #54 on: December 31, 2006, 02:39: PM »

Unless a person is brain dead it is not possible to have experience without acquiring knowledge. I have many reason for not liking OC, not the least of those reasons are that it was written by scientists, not animal trainers.

Any reputable course (here at least) is designed to open minds, to encourage to research and assess the already available research and to form your own opinions.

Experiencing the same thing over and over again does not allow for advancement. There are trainers who still hang dogs (lift off the ground on a choke chain) as part of their training ethos. The technique will work with some dogs (all techniques work with some dogs), but will cause untold damage to others. However, if these trainers don't explore other, better ways to get things done without causing the pain, harm and distress that this technique offers, then they will continue to use it because sometimes it works!! Is this type of experience good?? I think not. Yet many of these trainers boast many, many years of experience
Logged
Yorkie
Guest
« Reply #55 on: December 31, 2006, 02:41: PM »

my own record on these things is solid

Smile Smile Oh Denis, please stop!!! Laptops aren't good with spluttered coffee Smile
Logged
Denis_Carthy
Dogaholic


Respect Points: -23
Offline Offline

Posts: 690


View Profile
« Reply #56 on: December 31, 2006, 02:48: PM »

Quote
Yorki- Call it instead a remote training collar or even an electronic collar.

Well I dont have time to write anymore and as you have not pasted exactly what Lou has written I dont have time, as I am off out, just in case you dont know the date -

However call it what you want - so far you have proven them to be safer than being struck by lightening based ONLY on the UK figueres. No one in your organisation is allowed to learn anything about them, so heres more privaledged information.

Further figueres are, the remote market in the US was worth $350M last year (almost) so that decreases the odds on the 2 dogs you mentioned, I can give the company which gave me that figure, it was Innotek, however I will not give you my source inside Innotek.Now that must be MANY MILLIONS of collars to your 2 dogs (which dont exist anyway) because you have not proved it.

You can check both the UK figures and estimates yourself providing you canestablish you have a legitimate interest in getting the figures, otherwise you will not.

You must have clinical hysteria, 2 dogs might have fought (you dont beleive that anyway) out of MANY, Many millions of collars, I suppse if we could estimate the golbal figueres there would be a thousand time s more chance of being struck by lightening thananything going wrong with an e-collar - Yorki, you are a complete nutter -

WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE PAYING FOR 100% POSITIVE TRAINING FAILURES???


1. Lucky Star11-05-2005, 11:29 AM
Any ideas of any other way we can train recall because this reward based way doesn't seem to be working at all?

2. Lel-11-05-2005, 02:50 PM
We still cant let Libs off when others are around or in an unenclosed area as she takes no notice when someone and their dogs appear.

3. Murphy - 11-05-2005, 02:59 PM
My Murph has a terrible recall when there's distractions

4. Marean - 13-05-2005, 08:23 PM
I have a similar problem with Harvey, he is excellent with recalls until he finds something like a plastic bottle, big sticks or another dogs toy

5. iwlass 13-05-2005, 08:31 PM
 I have been using a long line to train Molo for 2 months or more as his recall went out of the window when he became a teen-pup

6. Helena 54 - 15-05-2005, 05:42 PM
if you absolutely know that they are totally distracted and you have no chance of getting them back (like I did this morning with some rabbits!)

7. JR-Tilly- 05-12-2006, 12:47 PM
Tilly out on a long line as i live in a rural area with lots of rabbits and she has a very strong hunting instinct

http://www.dogsey.com/showthread.php?t=10587

8.
Really frustrated
http://www.petfriendlyworld.com/chat/index.php?topic=6485.0
« Last Edit: December 31, 2006, 02:52: PM by Denis_Carthy » Logged

Denis_Carthy
Dogaholic


Respect Points: -23
Offline Offline

Posts: 690


View Profile
« Reply #57 on: December 31, 2006, 02:54: PM »

The Moral of The Story.

Say No To Treats and APDT Trainers.

The reasons, again, are below and above, above you see APDT Yorki trying at all costs to avoid the real problems, caused by what they call 'Positive Training', below, genuine people, being ripped off and actually paying for 100% failure, why would anyone want to pay for these results??? talk about charging people for old rope rubbish, good greif.

1. Lucky Star11-05-2005, 11:29 AM
Any ideas of any other way we can train recall because this reward based way doesn't seem to be working at all?

2. Lel-11-05-2005, 02:50 PM
We still cant let Libs off when others are around or in an unenclosed area as she takes no notice when someone and their dogs appear.

3. Murphy - 11-05-2005, 02:59 PM
My Murph has a terrible recall when there's distractions

4. Marean - 13-05-2005, 08:23 PM
I have a similar problem with Harvey, he is excellent with recalls until he finds something like a plastic bottle, big sticks or another dogs toy

5. iwlass 13-05-2005, 08:31 PM
 I have been using a long line to train Molo for 2 months or more as his recall went out of the window when he became a teen-pup

6. Helena 54 - 15-05-2005, 05:42 PM
if you absolutely know that they are totally distracted and you have no chance of getting them back (like I did this morning with some rabbits!)

7. JR-Tilly- 05-12-2006, 12:47 PM
Tilly out on a long line as i live in a rural area with lots of rabbits and she has a very strong hunting instinct

http://www.dogsey.com/showthread.php?t=10587

8.
Really frustrated
http://www.petfriendlyworld.com/chat/index.php?topic=6485.0
« Last Edit: December 31, 2006, 02:59: PM by Denis_Carthy » Logged

Yorkie
Guest
« Reply #58 on: December 31, 2006, 02:56: PM »

the moral of the story

one dog's meat is another man's obsession Smile
Logged
jenci
Fully Trained Dog Chat User


Respect Points: -3
Offline Offline

Posts: 53


View Profile
« Reply #59 on: December 31, 2006, 03:09: PM »

Quote
Any reputable course (here at least) is designed to open minds

And how does it open mnds? By considering what theory has to say? Or does it open minds by taking students to experienced and successful trainers to watch and learn? How many of these courses take their students to an experienced ecollar trainer to watch and observe the training? How many experinced modern ecollar trainers have you observed in training?

Quote
assess the already available research and to form your own opinions.


OC research is written by scientists, not animal trainers. There was a researcher in the 1950's who said that dogs cannot be taught to yawn on command. One day as trainer, an actual trainer that is, decided to test the theory - it took her about a week to teach.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 19
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.1 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC

Home

Pet Website Links
Free Pet Stuff | Dog Training Articles | Dog Newsletter | Dog Magazine |
| Funny Dog Videos | Pictures of Dogs | Dog Services & Pet Supplies

Published by K9 Media Ltd
 

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!