Earlier I wrote
That company wants nothing to do with the way that you represent yourself on this forum. They've asked for their name to be removed from every place that you've claimed an association with them. It seems to be quite obvious to me that the way that you conduct yourself here is a disgrace to them and they want nothing to do with it or you here.
Sorry Lou perhaps you could tell me where you got this information from?
Read this post from K9media.
http://www.petfriendlyworld.com/chat/index.php?topic=6679.msg53252#msg53252 Jenci perhaps you could inform us where a competent professional trainer using E collar techniques could be found? You see in the UK if the person was a competent professional trainer they would almost certainly not be using e collars.
Stan you told us yourself that quite a few gun dog trainers in the UK use them. Are they all incompetent?
do you think that having personally used them on three separate dogs
Thanks Stan, An admission of your vast experience with Ecollars. Let's not forget that you call what you did to those dogs "abusive." Your word not mine. And let's not forget that it happened
15 years ago. Yes, you're certainly up to speed on the latest happenings in Ecollars. ROFLMAO.
read Lou's site, and his explanations and the instructions and how the dogs act fearfully with his techniques
Gee, I've read my site dozens of times and have yet to find a single mention of how a dog "acted fearfully.'' I think you've purposefully misunderstood something again Stan. Please point this out to us and I'll straighten you out.
Perhaps you could also tell us how you know we are not educated in e collars.
Because of the constant comments that you make. The one above about "fearful" acting dogs is a good example. LOL.
Lou keeps telling us he is the recognised expert
You're a liar Stan. I've never applied that word to myself. In fact each time you have, I correct you, just as I've done AGAIN.
yet quite clearly on his site he describes fear and panic in the dogs he is treating. He describes it not as some third person bu by himself.
Stan is lying again. There's no such description of "fear and panic" of any dog that I'm working with.
Stan quotes me as saying
Actually I've never called myself an expert on anything.
yet in the last few pages he has bragged on how many seminars that he is doing and how if people read his instructions they would be competent. Just what exactly does Lou think he is saying by those statements!
Just that I know what I'm talking about. I've never used the word "expert" as applied to myself. You said I have and that makes you a liar. I may give a description of my experience and knowledge that leads other people to say it, but I still don't apply the term to myself.
I have repeated on a number of occasions that I am not on the staff of any company.
Yes you have.
AFTER you were caught telling us that you were "
THE behavioral advisor" for three companies. A reasonable, rational person, after hearing you make such a statement would believe that you were on the staff of those companies. Yet we now know that this is not the case. We now know that you are not now and never have been on any of their staffs as their "behavior advisor."
Yet until a few of us investigated your claims you were perfectly happy to let us believe that. It was only after a couple of them contacted you and probably told you to correct this claim that you did so. You certainly didn't make the correction before that was done. And then you tried to deny it, but it was too late, someone else has quoted your claim, making it impossible for you to deny that you'd edited your post.
You appear to not be able to understand this I have never ever been on the Staff of Burns
I understand this perfectly Stan. I also know that you claimed that you were.
I have never ever been on the Staff of EDITED BY MOD
Ditto. Am I seeing this right? Did you post the name of the company that asked that all reference to them be removed from this site and it had to be removed by a moderator? What disrespect! What audacity! But I guess I shouldn't be surprised, after all it is Stan. ROFL.
I have never been on the staff of Shooting Times
Yes we know. Now that your lie has been exposed.
I am self employed
You could be self employed and still be on the staff of a magazine. I was. It's called being an "independent contractor."
It means if I am paid by any of these companies and I am not paid by Burns, it is in a advisory capasity or as an author of articles. Do you understand that simple statement as you constantly refer to staff when I have never said anything of the sort ASSUMING AGAIN.
Not assuming anything that you didn't want me and the rest of the readers to assume Stan. It's quite clear what you wanted us to believe when you wrote, "I am
THE behavioral advisor to (an un-named company) Shooting Times and Burns (dog food.)." (Emphasis added.) You want us to believe that you are on their staff and that you are the ONLY behavioral advisor that they use. It's interesting to note that you didn't make the change in your writing until
AFTER those companies were contacted and they learned the lie that you'd been spouting.
"Methinks that Stan doth protest too much."
