That is why we do not answer many of your posts.
You don't answer my questions because you either don't know the answers or you know that it will pin you down and make you look bad. But it's good that you admit that you are purposefully don't answer my questions. You know how any response will make you look.
Earlier Stan wrote:
I do not cry poverty unlike you, who states you have never made a profit.
And I responded:
Another Stan lie! ROFL. I've never "cried poverty
OMG how many times has this man said he doesn't make a profit that he has no real vested interest then he comes out with this. Reality check please!
Sanity check please. Since when is saying that I don't make a profit and don't have a vested interest "crying poverty." Stan have you always had trouble with the English language or is it just recently.
Earlier I wrote
When did I say that you were suffering Stan?
On the numerous occasions you and Denis have said that we are only against E Collars because it is putting us out of business. Or have you conveniently forgotten that. You appear to be forgetting a lot lately.
Stan it appears that you are unable to read and understand simple English sentences. I didn't say that you were being put out of business I quite clearly said that as Ecollars grow in popularity you'll lose clients. There a significant difference but it's obviously too subtle for you.
Earlier I wrote in response to a moderator's post:
My God, the horror. Subjecting those poor 100 dogs to the abuse of your "really loud" shout, hurting their poor little ears like that; damaging their psyches for life.
And when Stan wrote this
I use the word quiet and it works for me. Not a advanced circuitry zapper in sight.
I replied with
I bet that works very well when you're not home. Just about anyone can quiet their dog when they're home; that's no special skill. ROFL.
Whats the difference? One is by a moderator. We call the people Toadies who do this in the UK. Toadying up to people in charge such as moderators, what do you call them in America.
I replied to the moderator as I did because he was joking around. My reply was in the same mode. I replied to you as I did because you were being your usual nasty Stan self.
But want to see some toadying up? Look at the exchange between Stan and the moderator after he sent in some articles that he'd written long ago. But really, who cares?
By the say I have never had ONE one problem ever with any of my dogs crying at home. I teach them to bark on request and once I have don that it is easy to teach them not to barkin numerous circumstances.
Well that's great Stan. People who don't have problems, don't have problems.
I have a little remote camera and sound pickup that can be used as a microphone that plugs into my laptop. I observe the dogs and can give commands even though I am not there, like a bark collar but without the serious behavioural problems they can produce.
Well there's a great bit of dog training advice. "Just purchase this camera and sound system (hundreds, if not thousands of dollars) closely monitor it every second in case your dog barks and if he does quickly give him a command to stop." Do you supply the cameras and sound system? Might think about that, it could boost your profits quite a bit. You're probably going to need it in a couple of years.
That is how I would have taught your dog. But of course you are going to say “done that tried that” as you normally do. Or you will say I thought you said you did not give advice. Therefore what is the use of telling you
No I never would have even considered such nonsense. And it's quite fitting that you'd suggest it. I have better things to do than to sit around monitoring a TV and sound system waiting for my dog to bark so that I can give him a command to stop. This is the stupidest response to a barking problem that I've ever heard. ROFL.
Earlier I wrote
Another Stan lie. I never said that you "do not need to ask questions." I said that you didn't need an extensive list, such as you use. Some basic questions are always OK.
I am not going to trawl through your interminable posts but you did say this. You actually ticked a whole lists of things you did not feel important like age when purchased, medical history, feeding regime etc etc etc
What was actually said, (Folks Stan has recently developed a problem with reality and memory. Notice that his writing falls apart late at night and it's nearly as poor in the morning. There's a cycle going on here that he desperately denies. Stan, admitting that you have a problem is the first step to recovery!) was that your specific questions were not necessary, that I obtain the needed information by asking more general ones that give me the same information. When I say "Tell me about your dog" I get the dog's history. I don't need to ask your interminable list of questions. I spent nearly 30 years interviewing witnesses and interrogating crooks, I'm well versed in how to get necessary information.
Earlier I wrote
I certainly don't, that would mean spending time with a client learning about them, getting a feel for them and finding out how they think. Stan has already told us how he does it. He gives them a questionnaire and has them fill it out even before he arrives.
No I don't,
That's what you said in another thread. Like you, I'm not going to trawl through your posts to find it. You're not that important.
Amazing all the other links appear to work for you Lou. Weasel words indeed. E mail the link or PM it then. Now that what I call a lie.
No need to email it or PM it. I prefer to deal with you in public where there's at least a semblance of courtesy. Here's the link. It takes me to the forum index. Searches for "surfer," "bird chasing dog," "chasing," and "seagull" didn't turn up the thread.
http://dogchat.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3737&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=260Earlier I wrote
Yep, that was the case. The dog was so fixated on chasing seagulls that he would chase them until he literally passed out. As soon as he recovered enough, he was up chasing them again if they were in sight.
But Lou you clearly said you did not say this a few posts ago
I don't think so Stan. Since if was "a few posts ago" you should be able to find it and quote it, including the link to that post.
I think the posters will make their own mind up who the liar is on this forum.
I'm pretty sure they already have. I'm not the one who claimed to be "THE behavioral advisor to three companies." That was you and we know that it was a lie. We also know that you tried to change it without telling any of us so that we wouldn't know about your change. You didn't come clean until several of us started investigating you and discovered the truth.
